Search  for anything...
New Line Home Entertainment

The Twilight Zone - The Complete Series (Season One)

    • Based on 218 reviews
Condition: New
Checking for product changes
$164.92 Why this price?

Buy Now, Pay Later

As low as $27.49 / mo
  • – 6-month term
  • – No impact on credit
  • – Instant approval decision
  • – Secure and straightforward checkout

Ready to go? Add this product to your cart and select a plan during checkout. Payment plans are offered through our trusted finance partners Klarna, PayTomorrow, Affirm, Afterpay, Apple Pay, and PayPal. No-credit-needed leasing options through Acima may also be available at checkout.

Learn more about financing & leasing here.

Free shipping on this product

This item is eligible for return within 30 days of receipt

To qualify for a full refund, items must be returned in their original, unused condition. If an item is returned in a used, damaged, or materially different state, you may be granted a partial refund.

To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.

View our full returns policy here.

Availability: Only 1 left in stock, order soon!
Fulfilled by Amazon
Arrives Thursday, Nov 21
Order within 15 hours and 38 minutes
Available payment plans shown during checkout

Description

Modernized version of the classic TV series includes 43 episodes featuring high-profile guest stars. The younger you are, the more you'll enjoy UPN's short-lived revival of The Twilight Zone. Front- loaded with young actors (or marginal celebrities, like Jessica Simpson) and a bone-jarring theme by Korn's Jonathan Davis, the show panders to a teen demographic, which original-series creator Rod Serling would never have tolerated. It's a pale copy of Serling's original, and even the 1985 TZ revival was marginally better, but there are some memorable exceptions in this 43-episode, six-disc set. Not surprisingly, the best episodes are straight remakes of (or sequels to) classic Serling originals, including "The Monsters on Maple Street," "It's Still a Good Life" (with former child actor Bill Mumy reprising his creepiest role, and featuring a series-best performance by Cloris Leachman), and "Eye of the Beholder." Of the originals to this series, highlights include the pilot episode with Jeremy Piven; Jason Alexander in "One Night at Mercy," Amber Tamblyn in "Evergreen"; Lukas Haas in "Harsh Mistress"; Lou Diamond Phillips in "The Pool Guy"; ER's Eriq La Salle as writer, director, and star of "Memphis"; and a few others that capture the eerie quality of "another dimension of sight, sound, and mind." Woefully miscast as the series' host, Forest Whitaker delivers facile introductions devoid of Serling's literary finesse. More often than not, the writing relies on forgettable characters and thinly-disguised variations on original-series themes; at its worst, the series demonstrates a staggering lack of originality, and the youthful casting frequently results in one-dimensional performances, with a few notable exceptions. It's hit-or-miss at best, but shooting locations in Vancouver, British Columbia, lend the series a visually stimulating variety of settings and atmosphere; production values are consistently high (as they were in the Canadian seasons of X-Files), and Rick Maguire deserves praise for his cinematography on virtually every episode. If you can forget Serling altogether (a difficult challenge for his devoted fans), you'll be able to overlook the flaws and enjoy some occasionally clever trips into The Twilight Zone as it was meant to be. --Jeff Shannon


Aspect Ratio ‏ : ‎ 1.781


Is Discontinued By Manufacturer ‏ : ‎ No


MPAA rating ‏ : ‎ NR (Not Rated)


Product Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 7.75 x 5.5 x 1.25 inches; 8.8 Ounces


Media Format ‏ : ‎ AC-3, Box set, Color, Closed-captioned, Dolby, DTS Surround Sound, Subtitled, Widescreen, NTSC


Run time ‏ : ‎ 16 hours


Release date ‏ : ‎ September 7, 2004


Actors ‏ : ‎ Forest Whitaker, Jeremy Piven, Olivia d'Abo, Vincent Laresca, Zeljko Ivanek


Subtitles: ‏ ‎ English, Spanish


Producers ‏ : ‎ Anthony Santa Croce, Mark Stern


Frequently asked questions

If you place your order now, the estimated arrival date for this product is: Thursday, Nov 21

Yes, absolutely! You may return this product for a full refund within 30 days of receiving it.

To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.

View our full returns policy here.

  • Klarna Financing
  • Affirm Pay in 4
  • Affirm Financing
  • Afterpay Financing
  • PayTomorrow Financing
  • Financing through Apple Pay
Leasing options through Acima may also be available during checkout.

Learn more about financing & leasing here.

Similar Products

Top Amazon Reviews

    • A New House Built On An Old Foundation
I'm going to make this short but yet "truthful!" Actually, these modern twilight zone episodes, which unfortunately; only televised for one season. Should've went on throughout other seasons! As I read some of these reviews: They make Forest Whitaker out to be the bad guy. They judge him on stuff like: Him walking while explaining the phenomena of what was going on, Or he didn't tell them the same way as it was told in days of the original Etc; But the truth of the matter is: No, Forest isn't Rod or vice versa. Because they're 2 totally different people without having the same personalities,voices,Etc; But none of these aspects make Forest any less of a host. He already knew the judgements would be made from people comparing his style to the one of the old. But any of you reviewers would feel the same level of pressure if you was trying to host a new series from the old. I guarantee you that their'll be "some" people in this generation, who'll like the modernized first season version of the twilight zone. That he did, in some/many ways, over the original! Why is simple: Because thoughts change- (In order to go along with the current times that a generation of people live in!) An example- The old movie "Scarface" Though it already is or It soon will be a collector's item in the future. However, their will be other later versions of that same movie each generation. Then the viewers of that era will become the positive reviewers of the newer versions and yet critics of the older ones. Because again, it goes back to what was wrote in parenthesis above! Sometime in the future,their will come a time, where; The modern version that Forest was a host of: It'll also become a collector's item for the current generation twilight zone movie buff. Sure, u might read this and laugh now! "But mock my word" As the saying goes,"Theirs nothing new under the sun" Its just that more flavor gets added each time around! A thousand years from now- If, televisions exist, their will be someone who'll come along and revive those twilight zone episodes that later become the old! And so on! And in that time period of the future- They'll laugh at any previous versions of it,including the original ones that started in black & white. So the bottom line is this: Lets appreciate the hard work that Forest put into this: Because of his own love for the original twilight zone episodes! He deserves an applause for his bravery,creativity,dedication and love that he has for the twilight zone stuff. If you would've been in his shoes- Perhaps, you would've been to fearful, to try and host, or re-tell, episodes that were told in color! I highly liked the latest series! In fact, in many ways, I prefer some of the latest over the episodes of the old! Why,is because the new always builds on the old. And some things get better as time goes on though other things get worse! But what gets labelled as being "better or worse" All depends on the reviewers point of view! Regardless of the ratings: I personally think these series were excellent! To me, it is well worth giving it 5 stars! P.S. All Things Are In A Constant Flux Nothing Is Meant To Remain The Same! "This My Readers Is" UNIVERSAL LAW! ... show more
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on March 22, 2012 by EAGLE EYE
    • A for Effort?
I was hesitant to buy the latest installation of The Twilight Zone after reading all of the extremely negative reviews, but I'm glad that I did. Before some internet browsing, I wasn't even aware of this most recent failed attempt. Firstly, there will never be another Rod Serling, or any other Twilight Zone reenactment that fully captures the essence of the original. That said, I think there are quite a few episodes from the first installation that fall flat and are weak or nonsensical. It never was perfection, although it was close. This series did what it could. Personally, I was intrigued to see how the aspects of current culture would play out. At times it is fairly interesting; at others, cheesy. Similarly, the music is horrible. Try to tune it out. Additionally, the 2002 version doesn't quite seem to "get" the essence of the original Twilight Zone, although it certainly tries. The Twilight Zone is mysterious, it is chilling, it is at the very core of each and every one of us. Here, the Twilight Zone is something to be played at, and fallen into briefly. What I liked about the original is that it made you think. The same applies here, but the answers seem to come more easily. Perhaps that is the adaption to modernity- ouch. Also, what were they thinking in casting Forrest Whitaker as narrator? This man falls flat when it comes to conveying the chilling and perplexing conundrums found within the Twilight Zone. He is far too happy, peppy, and all over the place strange- which, for the most part, isn't what the Twilight Zone is about. I'm sure they could have found someone much more captivating. Maybe this new upbeat attempt at narration was another modern, "fresh" spin that just didn't work. For serious Twilight Zone fans, I would probably recommend skipping the two remakes. "The Monsters are Due on Maple Street" is my all time favorite episode, and I literally cringed when watching it. The acting is so laughingly shameful and annoyingly grating. The new premise (terrorism) is thought-provoking, but far less inciting than the original. The usage of aliens just wasn't so obvious in what they represented politically. Also, the acting found in "Eye of the Beholder" by Molly Sims doesn't even begin to compare to Maxine Stuart or Donna Douglas. I appreciated the attempt, but I really don't feel it was needed. I guess what is to be learned is that no one will ever be fully satisfied with the remakes. However, there are some good moments- it's not a total waste. It is still captivating, but in a smaller way. If another attempt is ever created, however, I can only hope that no episode is "revamped" and predictably slaughtered, and that Forrest Whitaker stays far, far away. ... show more
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on October 3, 2009 by R. Rice

Can't find a product?

Find it on Amazon first, then paste the link below.