Search  for anything...
Canon

Used Canon 70-200mm F2.8 L is II Lens W/Lens Hood and Case

    • Based on 829 reviews
Condition: New
This product is temporarily out of stock.

Notify me when this product is back in stock

$2,049.00 Why this price?

Buy Now, Pay Later

As low as / mo
  • – Up to 36-month term if approved
  • – No impact on credit
  • – Instant approval decision
  • – Secure and straightforward checkout

Ready to go? Add this product to your cart and select a plan during checkout. Payment plans are offered through our trusted finance partners Klarna, PayTomorrow, Affirm, Afterpay, Apple Pay, and PayPal. No-credit-needed leasing options through Acima may also be available at checkout.

Learn more about financing & leasing here.

Free shipping on this product

30-day refund/replacement

To qualify for a full refund, items must be returned in their original, unused condition. If an item is returned in a used, damaged, or materially different state, you may be granted a partial refund.

To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.

View our full returns policy here.

Availability: Unavailable
Fulfilled by Camera Wholesalers Authorized Dealer
Available payment plans shown during checkout

Features

  • 70-200 mm focal length and 1:2.8 maximum aperture
  • Lens construction consists of 23 elements in 19 groups (1 fluorite and 5 UD elements)
  • 34-Degree - 12-Degree diagonal angle of view
  • Inner focusing system with USM and full-time manual focus option
  • 77 mm filter size. Extenders Compatible

Description

The Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Telephoto Zoom Lens increases the speed, performance and optical quality of the EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM while maintaining all of the characteristics that have made it a legend for professionals and advanced amateurs alike. This lens features one fluorite and five UD elements for increased optical quality and reduced chromatic aberration. It has a minimum focusing distance of 1.2m/3.9 ft. at all zoom settings, which is useful for photographers in smaller spaces trying to get closer to a subject. A next-generation Optical Image Stabilizer, provides up to 4 stops of correction at all focal lengths. Plus the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM is dust- and moisture-resistant and designed for use in the challenging environments typical of rigorous professional use. From the Manufacturer Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Telephoto Zoom Lens

Specs & Other Info

SpecificationDetails
BrandCanon
ApertureF2.8
Lens CategoryTelephoto
Mount CompatibilityCanon EF
Lens Warranty200 months
Dimensions7.83 x 3.5 x 3.5 inches
Weight2.9 pounds
Model Number2751B002
Battery Requirement1 Product-specific battery needed
Production StatusCurrently available
Release DateJanuary 4, 2010
ManufacturerCanon Cameras US

Frequently asked questions

The Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens has a maximum aperture of f/2.8. This allows for enhanced performance in low light conditions and the ability to achieve a shallow depth of field for portraits and detailed shots.

The Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens is compatible with all Canon SLR cameras, both full-frame and crop sensor (APS-C) models. However, on crop sensor cameras, it will have an effective focal length of approximately 112-320mm due to the crop factor.

Yes, the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens features an Image Stabilization (IS) system. This system helps to reduce the appearance of camera shake by up to four stops, making it easier to capture sharp images at slower shutter speeds or while shooting handheld.

The Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens is highly suitable for sports and wildlife photography due to its fast f/2.8 maximum aperture, which allows for faster shutter speeds to freeze motion. Additionally, its rapid and silent Ultrasonic Motor (USM) autofocus system enables quick and accurate focusing on moving subjects, while the durable build and weather sealing allow for use in various outdoor conditions.

Similar Products

Top Amazon Reviews

🚀 Abunda's Overview

This is our summary and key points to consider based on customer reviews.

The Canon EF 70-200mm lens garners high praise for its remarkable image quality, fast autofocus, and professional appeal, especially in its most recent iteration. Users appreciate its versatility for a wide array of photography needs including weddings, portraiture, and events. While some find the lens heavy, its performance and the resulting image sharpness across various situations outweigh this drawback. The more recent version improves upon its predecessor with even sharper images, quicker focusing, and a more effective image stabilization system.

Pros

  • 📸 Remarkable image quality that stands out even among professionals
  • 🚀 Extremely fast autofocus, capable of focusing in almost complete darkness
  • 🔧 Versatile for a variety of photography needs, from events to portraits
  • 🛠 Improved image stabilization in newer versions, facilitating low-light shooting without a tripod
  • 👁️ Closer focus capabilities and a zoom feature that does not extend the barrel

Cons

  • ⚖️ Noticeable weight, which might be cumbersome in long shooting sessions
  • 🏷️ High cost, although justified by the lens's quality and performance
  • 🛠 Tripod mount design on the newer version might interfere with quick zoom adjustments

Should I Buy It?

If you're invested in photography, particularly in fields requiring top-notch image quality and versatility, this lens is worth the investment. Its performance, especially in terms of autofocus speed and image sharpness, sets a high standard. Though expensive, the lens's ability to hold its value and its utility in a professional setting may well justify the cost for serious photographers.

    • Everything you've heard is TRUE about this lens!
Style: Lens Only
Like you, I'm guessing, I debated back and fourth about whether to buy this lens or go with another less costly option. I'd read the reviews both here and online at the various sites. Already owned a 100 Macro IS L and 135mm f2 L and 200mm F2.8L II. All, by the way, are outstanding lenses! I even had the 70-200 f4 IS L that is considerably smaller and lighter than this lens. But I was never crazy about the "bokeh" the f4 L IS version gave me. So I sold it and just shot my primes. No question, the primes I own are truly great optics. Even the often forgotten 200mm 2.8L II produces spectacular results. But I had few recent shoots, where my subjects were constantly moving and I found myself not able to reposition myself, get closer or further away quickly enough when needed and inevitably missed some key shots because I could not change lenses quickly enough. Did what I could afterwords in Photoshop, but results could have been better. That frustrated me. So came here, and would read, reread the user reviews and almost click "Add to Cart" several times. Finally gave in and just did it. Figured the worst scenario was I'd test it against my current lenses and if it didn't hold up, I'd neatly pack it back into the box and return it. As soon as I go the lens, unpacked it and after being thoroughly impressed with the build quality, the nice lens case and hood, I got out my tripod and other prime L glass and shot it against this 70-200 IS L II. To put it in a nutshell "WOW"!! The lens truly has amazing image quality, far better than I anticipated. On a tripod, the results for all the lens were great. Though, to my eye the contrast and flare control was better on this zoom. Seem to also focus more accurately and frankly felt faster to lock on to subject. Hand-held, this zoom came into its own, especially against the non-IS primes. It wasn't even close. The 4-stop IS on this new zoom is a great, great tool and welcome addition. That alone, for me, justifies this purchase. It will be the difference between an image that can be enlarged greatly and one that 'just missed' due to camera shake that becomes visible as you start to enlarge the image. Focusing, build quality are all 5 Stars and so good that I love not having to worry about either or second guess the focusing system or wonder if I had shot it with a prime would it have been sharper when I'm shooting. If you shoot with a monopod or tripod, the primes are terrific, no question. Canon makes great L Glass. But if you find yourself shooting hand-held and considering this lens...just do it. Don't waste the hours I did, staring at the computer screen debating and reading everything I could find on this lens. Just buy it, you'll sleep better I promise! Cons, if I'd have to say anything negative thus far, I wish it were less expensive by say $500 dollars or so. It's a fair amount of money to give up for non-exotic focal length, I believe it's double the cost of the f4 IS L version. That's a steep entry fee into the land of f2.8. But the 'bokeh' is better and I bought this lens to shoot wide open. I can't comment on whether the 'bokeh' is better than the previous 70-200 L IS. I have read the older lens produced "less busy" background blur. I'm perfectly happy with what I see coming from this current lens. But truth be told, it's a lens I see myself using more than just about all the my other with the possible exception being the 50mm. The other con, we've all read is about the weight, and yes it's heavy, but when mounted to the camera and in use, it doesn't feel cumbersome. I'm sure sitting in a shoulder bag, carrying it around for a few hours will become fatiguing. For that, I'd tell you to get a good photo backpack. It makes a world of difference in terms of dealing with the weight. Believe me, I learn that the hard way on a full day shoot up in the Utah mountains. I now use a Kata Ultralight photo backpack, that I love. Only one I believe with a trampoline mesh frame on the backside, so sweaty, smelly back is not the concern it used to be. Good structure to the pack too! Anyhow, got off on a tangent. Would I recommend this lens, ABSOLUTELY!! It's a keeper! I'm NOT second guessing myself at all on this one. Thank you to everyone here that wrote their hands-on reviews that helped me make a decision! Hope my review helps someone that's on the fence like I was. ... show more
Reviewed in the United States on January 20, 2011 by Bulldog
    • [BLEEP]ing Insane!
Style: Lens Only
I have been lusting after a 70-200 f/2.8 lens for 2 years now. After spending over a month researching which brand and model to get, I realized that I could never be truly happy without The Best. So I was going to get a Mark I version of this lens... until the Mark II came out. Then I had to decide if it was really worth the jump in price. Being that I have a tendency to choose "the best or nothing"... it really didn't take me long to start saving. Again. Disappointed, sure, but the reviews told me that my patience would be rewarded. And it has been. To be honest, I have only used it for a little while so far, so I'll update this review when I have more to say, but so far here's what I can tell you. The weight: It's there. This lens will require a tripod or a monopod for long shoots, unless you are used to it. Update: I am apparently used to it now, because I don't notice it anymore. Image quality: Expletives of an uncouth nature escaped my mouth involuntarily when I first saw the IQ this lens produces for myself. On my 5D Mark II, it's ... well, it's [BLEEP]ing insane! This lens makes my Canon 24-70 F/2.8 L look somewhat soft, even after being micro-adjusted. And believe me, I have a sharp copy! The difference is obvious. Image Stabilization: Very good. I can read the street signs a block away at 200 mm, ISO 100, f/2.8 with a shutter speed of 1/60. [Update: The IS consistently allows me to shoot at 1/13th of a second hand held, even at 200mm and get the shot, sharp. I could not believe my eyes when I first saw this... now I rely on it regularly. It doesn't work every time, but most of the time.] This is where the sharpness really shines, because even relying on IS, it's sharper than my Canon 24-70 2.8 L. But indoors, in a dimly lit room, at f/2.8 and ISO 100, getting shutter speeds of 1/6th to 1/8th of a second, and 200 mm, I was getting motion blur that was faint, but noticeable. It effectively made the resulting image soft, while remaining fully recognizable (and in many cases, usable). I wasn't quite as blown away by that as by everything else, but maybe I should be, considering the number of stops distance that is? This lens is bigger than I expected. It also allows me to shoot through chain link fence without being impeded by that fence - if the subject is more than 15 feet away. Last I went to the zoo, I was shooting a 28-135, and the 135/f3.2 wasn't enough to blur the fence out. My uncle was shooting a 28-300 Nikon lens at f/6.3, and was getting great shots I could not get because his lens at 200-300 mm was blurring the fencing out. Now I can not just shoot the things he can shoot, but completely blow away the image quality his lens gets!!! My first impression: Blown away. Breathlessly in awe. Ho-Lee-[BLEEP]! I have to say, I think my 24-70 L is feeling dejected now. That price tag you see on this baby? It's also [BLEEP]ing insane. But when you consider the factors - quality of build, quality of image, quality of IS, light gathering power, and the reasonable expectation that this will be a purchase you only have to make once to get literally a lifetime of exceptional use and value out of the thing - it is worth what it costs. Every penny. I wasn't sure I'd agree with the others here saying that, but I do. Just one word of warning: if you buy this lens, be careful. It's so sharp, you may reasonably worry about cutting your eyes looking the results. :) More when I have put her through her paces. Update 01-06-2011: Disappointingly, I have not had as many opportunities to use this lens since I bought it as I would have liked. My 24-70 has been my workhorse lens because of the very close quarters I have been working in recently. However, I have a few points you might be interested in. First, micro adjustment with my copy proved entirely unnecessary. at -5, there was a noticeable loss of detail; +0 to +5 are indistinguishable and as sharp as it gets. Had it set for +3 for a while, but literally, even at 200% magnification, you just cannot tell the difference between 0, +3 and +5. Second, my copy is sharpest at f/6.3. Kind of a surprise, since I was expecting 5.6. Third, if you're not used to using IS, it can take some getting used to, waiting a moment for the IS to stabilize. This has cost me sharpness in a lot of situations where it was critical. For some people, this lens will take time to get used to. For a little while, I thought my lens was somehow regressing in sharpness. Turns out I'm not giving it time to settle the IS. Fourth, to my utter amazement, IS actually has shown noticeable improvement in image quality hand held even up to a shutter speed of 1/8000th of a second in recent tests. I thought it would degrade image quality after 1/200th, but this appears not to be the case for my copy. Astounding. Update 11-07-2011: I now turn to this lens as a matter of common sense when the light is low. f/2.8 24-70 cannot keep up with this lens in very low light because of it's IS capability. It's as good as or better than my 16-35 on that point because the IS is so good. I would prefer to just leave this lens on my camera all the time, but foot zoom is not always a reasonable option, so the 24-70 still wins out most of the time simply because I use those focal lengths a lot in tight quarters. But this is my overall favorite lens, in spite of that fact. ... show more
Reviewed in the United States on September 2, 2010 by SLM

Can't find a product?

Find it on Amazon first, then paste the link below.