Search  for anything...
Canon

Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens with UV Protection Lens Filter - 77 mm

    • Based on 468 reviews
Condition: New
Checking for product changes
$1,308.34 Why this price?

Buy Now, Pay Later

As low as / mo
  • – Up to 36-month term with PayTomorrow
  • – No impact on credit
  • – Instant approval decision
  • – Secure and straightforward checkout

Ready to go? Add this product to your cart and select a plan during checkout. Payment plans are offered through our trusted finance partners Klarna, PayTomorrow, Affirm, Afterpay, Apple Pay, and PayPal. No-credit-needed leasing options through Acima may also be available at checkout.

Learn more about financing & leasing here.

Selected Option

Free shipping on this product

30-day refund/replacement

To qualify for a full refund, items must be returned in their original, unused condition. If an item is returned in a used, damaged, or materially different state, you may be granted a partial refund.

To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.

View our full returns policy here.

Availability: In Stock.
Fulfilled by Amazon
Arrives Saturday, Sep 21
Order within 8 hours and 8 minutes
Available payment plans shown during checkout

Style: w/ UV Protection Filter


Features

  • Full-time manual focus permits critical focusing precision, even in AF mode
  • UV protection filter for general, everyday use
  • Reduces ultraviolet light; helps eliminate bluish cast in images

Brand: Canon


Photo Filter Thread Size: 77 Millimeters


Photo Filter Effect Type: Ultraviolet


Water Resistance Level: Not Water Resistant


Product Dimensions: 3.03"L x 3.03"W


Date First Available: January 17, 2018


Country of Origin: Japan


Frequently asked questions

If you place your order now, the estimated arrival date for this product is: Saturday, Sep 21

Yes, absolutely! You may return this product for a full refund within 30 days of receiving it.

To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.

View our full returns policy here.

  • Klarna Financing
  • Affirm Pay in 4
  • Affirm Financing
  • Afterpay Financing
  • PayTomorrow Financing
  • Apple Pay Later
Leasing options through Acima may also be available during checkout.

Learn more about financing & leasing here.

Similar Products

Top Amazon Reviews

    • Amazing lens at a great price
Style: Lens Only
For me this is the perfect wide angle zoom. While it's still a decent sized lens it's light and small compared to it's 2.8 counterpart. The IS works amazingly well and it's even pretty damn sharp wide open.
Reviewed in the United States on July 12, 2024 by Keith Phillips
    • So many good things to say, but I'll try to summarize
Style: Lens Only
I have used this lens on a bunch of jobs including a small bathroom and I love this lens. My only complaint is that at 16mm the angle is so wide I have a hard time hiding my lights! The chromatic aberration control is fantastic! the best I've seen—not that I've seen every lens for every system—, but this lens is really an interior/landscape photographers dream. The transition between extreme contrast situations like sun beaming through a window is controlled incredibly well. It is a sharp lens and it is sharp all the way to the corners, getting only a little softer in the corners. And the distortion is well controlled as well with some barrel distortion at 16mm and some pin cushion at 35mm, but very reasonable. It has the more standard 77mm diameter which means you can swap filters with your other "L" series lenses. It feels well built, it should be, it is an "L" lens. The hood is awesome too. So much easier and more elegant than other hoods that I have for other "L" lenses, seems like a small thing, but why didn't Canon do this before? I can't explain why I like the button feature on the hood so much, but I do, it just goes on so smoothly and then it locks into place, love it! This lens is a bit expensive compared to some other competitive lenses, but if you care about the things I mention above, paying an extra $400–$500 is well worth it. If you're just getting into wide angle, landscape or interior photography you might want to look at some of the less expensive lenses out there. There are some with a lot of fanfare which I seriously considered, but after using many other wide angle lenses including Canon's 14mm prime I settled on this one. There are some primes out there that are better than this lens, but primes should be better, although I didn't love the 14mm as much as I thought I would. I wanted the zoom for that little bit of flexibility that it offers. In interior photography there are only so many places to set up your tripod and gear and being able to zoom in or out just a little is well worth the trade off. Also the fact that you can use filters on a lens this wide is a huge bonus. I like this lens a lot, but it's not for everybody. I think that Canon priced this lens fairly, although I would like it better if it was around $900. I'm very happy with this lens and would highly recommend it! ... show more
Reviewed in the United States on December 8, 2014 by Julius Caesar
    • This wonderful lens is now my favorite one
Style: Lens Only
Update -- 8-19-2014 I have now taken my new 16-35mm f/4 to shoot those pesky stars and let me say... I was right. The corners at f/4 are so nice. If you zoom in, you can see that there are still some SLIGHT issues, however, the corners are much better than when compared to the 17-40L. If you have to zoom in to see the problems, then most people who look at your image won't notice. There is virtually no image degradation in the corners and the center is so very clean. And it only gets better from there. Stopping down, you get improved resolution in the corners by f/5.6 and there is much less vignetting. When used with a Neutral Density filter, you can get some very nice looking long exposures. It is a little longer and heavier than the 17-40L, but the improvements far outweigh the size increase. As to the construction quality, it is so solid. The switches offer enough solidity without being to firm and the zoom and focus rings have plenty of grip on them. On mine, the zoom ring is a little stiff, however, it is a brand new lens. I've only ever bought used lenses until this one so I'm sure it will loosen in time. I am very happy with my choice over the 17-40L. Original -- 8-10-2014 Alright, so you're looking at a new wide-angle lens. You've obviously heard about the Canon 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens or you were directed here from another location on the Internet. Either way, you were now looking at reviews for a brand-new lens and possibly wondering to yourself, `How good is this lens really?". Well, let me see if I can help. Back in 2003, Canon released the 17-40mm f/4L USM lens to the general public and, as of today, you can get a used one from a reputable place here on Amazon or eBay for about $600 to $700. I rented one a couple of months ago and, to be honest, I thought it was pretty good. However, I was shooting some astrophotography and I noticed in one of the corners the "coma effect". If you take a picture of a relatively small circular object such as a star you will see that it looks somewhat deformed. Considering that this is something that I want to do, that's a problem for me. In reading around on the Internet the different reviews for the 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM released in 2007, I saw that it had the potential of having slightly mushy corners. Whereas on both of these lenses the center can be pretty sharp, the corners is an important consideration for me being as I want the entire image to be clear and stunning. Coming in at about $1500, I really didn't want to look at this one in the first place. Yes, it has the 2.8 aperture, but at 2-3 times the price of the 17-40, I would've much rather purchased the cheaper and older model and still have gotten about the same images. Now, here comes Canon's release of the 16-35mm f/4L IS USM at a middle-of-the-road $1200. The appeal to me wasn't the $1200 price tag. If that was the only consideration then I would've straight up purchased the 17-40, however, my consideration is based on all-around image quality. This means having to test out my new lens. So I did. As a short term test goes, the clichéd "brick wall" test is a good way to compare two lenses side-by-side. I compared it to my 24-70mm f/2.8L version I (a lens that is known to be very good) and went about looking at those pesky corners. The results give me hope about my new lens. The corners were very good when compared to my 24-70. However, being in the middle-to-end of summer makes it very difficult to want to go outside, even at night, to take pictures for hours. So for now, my short-term test is good enough for me. When I'm able to, I will update my review with my findings in regards to the lens with prolonged use. So until then, I hope my review helps you a little bit. I know it's not much to read, however, it's an honest review from someone who is attempting to use photography as a way to create something meaningful and amazing. If you want to watch the comparison video I made, then type "canon 16-35mm f/4l is usm review" in YouTube's search bar and look for my name. If you have any questions then please ask them in the comments and I will do my best to help you. Thank you for reading and happy shooting! ... show more
Reviewed in the United States on August 11, 2014 by Jacob

Can't find a product?

Find it on Amazon first, then paste the link below.